CGT Valuation — ATO-compliant property valuers Get a quote
— SMSF compliance

SMSF property valuations your auditor will not send back.

Trustees are required to report fund assets at market value every year, supported by objective and supportable evidence. This guide explains what that phrase means in practice, and where trustees most often fall short.

Updated 4 August 20267 min readWritten by a Certified Practising Valuer
Reg 8.02B
The SIS regulation requiring market value reporting
Annually
Assets must be valued for each financial year
Objective
Evidence an auditor can independently review
All classes
Residential, commercial, industrial and rural

What regulation 8.02B actually requires

SIS regulation 8.02B requires an SMSF's assets to be reported at market value in the fund's accounts and statements for each income year. The regulation does not require a full valuation from a registered valuer every single year, but it does require the reported figure to be supported by objective and supportable data.

The ATO's guidance is clear that a trustee's own estimate, an old purchase price, or a council rating notice is not sufficient on its own for property. The practical result is that most funds holding real property obtain an independent valuation, then support it in intervening years with a documented review.

How often a fund really needs a new valuation

An external valuation is expected where the property represents a significant proportion of the fund's assets, where the market has moved materially, or where a specific event occurs — a pension commencing, a member benefit being paid, an in-specie transfer, or the fund being wound up.

For a stable residential holding in a steady market, a documented annual review referencing an independent valuation obtained within the last three years is commonly accepted. Your auditor sets the expectation; we can write the report to suit the cycle they have asked for.

What causes auditors to reject a value

Rejections almost never turn on the valuer's figure. They turn on what is missing around it.

No named valuer, or a valuer without API accreditation
An appraisal from the agent who manages the property for the fund
No comparable sales evidence attached
A valuation date that does not align with 30 June
Related-party property valued without acknowledging the relationship
A single figure with no methodology or assumptions stated
In practice

Where the fund holds business real property leased to a related party, expect the auditor to look closely at both the capital value and the rent. We can address both in one report.

Commercial and business real property

Commercial holdings are the most common source of SMSF valuation difficulty because value is driven by the lease as much as by the building. A valuation needs to test the passing rent against market rent, and to state the capitalisation rate applied and why.

Where the tenant is a related party, the arm's length nature of the lease is squarely in scope. A valuation that quietly accepts the rent the fund is charging itself is exactly the kind of report that generates an audit qualification.

The evidence pack we provide

Every SMSF report is written to be handed straight to the auditor without a covering explanation: valuation as at the relevant date, methodology, comparable sales and lettings, assumptions, and the signature and API details of the Certified Practising Valuer who prepared it.

Where a fund holds several properties, we run them as a single engagement with one schedule and one invoice, so the trustee is not chasing four separate reports in September.

Common questions

Can trustees value the fund's property themselves?

A trustee may determine the value, but it must be based on objective and supportable evidence. For real property, that in practice means an independent valuation or a documented review referencing one. Most auditors will not accept a trustee estimate alone.

Does the valuation have to be dated 30 June?

It should be as at 30 June for annual reporting purposes. Valuations obtained close to year end can usually be written as at 30 June where nothing material has changed, and we will state that assumption clearly.

Do you value the property or the fund's share of it?

Both are possible. Where the fund holds a part interest, we value the whole property and state the fund's proportionate interest, noting any discount considerations the auditor should be aware of.

— Continue reading

Related guides in this cluster.

ATO compliance
What makes a valuation ATO-compliant
Who can sign, what evidence is needed, what gets challenged.
Read guide →
Cost & timing
What a CGT valuation costs
What drives the fee, and how fast a report can realistically move.
Read guide →
Retrospective
Retrospective CGT valuations
How a valuer reconstructs a past market and defends the number.
Read guide →

Audit season approaching?

Send us the fund's property list and your auditor's requirements. Multi-property funds are quoted as one engagement.

Get a fixed-fee quote 1300 768 862